College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

SGA considers cracking down on smokers

Senators working to implement harsher on-campus restrictions; ban possible in future

By David Haydon

Print this article

Published: Friday, November 13, 2009

Updated: Friday, November 13, 2009

Faculty, students and staff who smoke on campus face possible restrictions and enforcement — ranging from the increased prohibition of smoking near building entrances to the possibility of a smoke-free campus — from two Student Government Association senators.

“(Hotel and Restaurant Management Sen. Dennis) Ha is working on a smoke-free campus. I’m trying to get UH police to be stricter on smoking around buildings,” Business Sen. Luis Rodriguez said. “I’ve been wanting to work on (legislation that) would have the UH police department give more citations.”

Ha said he wants to make UH a smoke-free campus, but this will take some time.

“It’s not the fact that people smoke, which is bad for their health, its (that) people who don’t smoke have a problem,” Ha said. “Our main objective will be a smoke-free campus, but you have to take it in small steps … we need to think about all the consequences if we take that away.”

Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights created a list of the colleges and universities around the country that enforce smoke-free air policies, stating that there are at least 365 campuses — including 13 in Texas — that are smoke-free.

“Everyone has the right to do whatever they want as long as it does not infringe on someone else’s rights,” Rodriguez said. “Some people say that drinking is worse than smoking because you can’t drink and drive a car but you can smoke and drive just fine. However, there is toxicity in smoking … it isn’t just the smoke the person is smoking … but the secondhand and thirdhand smoke.”

Both senators stressed the unlikelihood of implementing a completely smoke-free campus in the immediate future.

“It’s not going to happen,” Rodriguez said. “If we were going to stop smoking we might as well shut down cellular towers because those could cause exposure to a lot of radiation. We’d also have to stop people from coming in with the flu. We can’t protect our body from every disease and external factor. The 20 feet around doors (restriction) is a great thing to do because it lets students get to where they need to without smoke in their face.”

Ha said that although a smoke-free campus would be ideal, he knows the reality of it happening is unlikely.

“What I and the Hilton College are worried about is that if we do become a smoke-free campus, we’ll lose students coming through to the college,” Ha said. “I’m also representing people who do smoke. If I’m only representing the voices of the non-smokers, then I’m not really doing my job.”

Rodriguez said one of the issues with transitioning a campus into a smoke-free environment is that in many foreign societies, smoking is the norm.

“We have a lot of international students … in their (cultures) it’s perfectly acceptable to smoke,” Rodriguez said. “In our culture, it’s less acceptable … I don’t want to say that in the U.S. it’s a taboo, but it’s less encouraged.”

The UH Police Department enforces the current restrictions on campus, which range from the 50-foot distance around the A.D. Bruce Religion Center to the common 20-foot distance from most buildings, but only on a minor basis.

“We don’t get many calls about it,” UH Police Chief Malcolm Davis said.

Davis said that although issuing citations to students smoking in non-smoking areas does occur, it is rare.

“I would hope that we could do it on an administrative level rather than a criminal level. When we get the occasional report, a staff or faculty member will let the department head handle it,” Davis said. “Most people will do what you ask if you talk to them.

“If you see someone smoking where they shouldn’t be, just tell them that they need to be at one of the smoking areas.”

news@thedailycougar.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

17 comments

Matthew Simon
Wed Nov 18 2009 17:11
This is another argument making absolutely no progress. Instead of voicing opinions on a level-headed platform and just asking someone who is smoking to move a few yards away, the elephant in the room is wrecking the sensibility.

Third-hand smoke?

Just quit stewing in anger at smokers, and walk a lap around the campus, casually asking people to keep the doorways clear of smoke. Dont ask the (campus profitting) police to up their citations when you could be more proactive and interactive Mr. Senator.

Your name
Tue Nov 17 2009 15:34
also, when and where will we (the students) be able to vote on this bill?
Your name
Tue Nov 17 2009 15:33
well, big brother already makes us wear seatbelts. by the same reasoning they should also be able to make us stop smoking, eating high fructose corn syrup, and talk on cell phones.
Anonymo
Tue Nov 17 2009 13:02
Hey hui, stop trolling. With a name like that (rude word for rod in Russian) I would shut up.
hui
Tue Nov 17 2009 04:02
supply nike shoes airmax TN sport shoes ----supply nike shoes airmax 90 sport shoes
supply nike shoes airmax 95 sport shoes------supply nike shoes airmax 97 sport shoes
supply nike shoes airmax 03 sport shoes------supply nike shoes airmax 06 sport shoes
www.tradertrade.com
Your name
Sun Nov 15 2009 19:22
Dan lets be clear on some things. Just because the DC trip was itemized as $6,700 does not mean the trip cost $6,700. What is the actual cost? I bet it is more than $6,700. Second, why not take it a step better, ya know for the sake of transparency, and not just post the budget but post the actual expenses. Third, it is nearly 6 months into the SGA term and the website has still not been updated or changed. Fourth, if the SGA senators are concerned with the possibility of wrong doing why don’t they look into it?
Your name
Sat Nov 14 2009 18:52
Maybe we should simply outlaw smoking in America... then tell people what they can eat... and listen to and read.
Zed
Sat Nov 14 2009 05:32
Why discriminate on smokers now? Really, is that the big issue nowadays? Yeah theres definitely no other big issues that could require some attention besides this one.

I mean seriously, the rampant construction produces more acrid air than that of this alleged "smoker blight" our campus seems to be suffering from. =P

Will Barrett
Fri Nov 13 2009 17:31
Thank you, Daniel. That's a well reasoned response. I wish there were more of those.
Dan Cato
Fri Nov 13 2009 15:05
Since these comments are almost identical to the ones on yesterday's article. I'll simply comment on these. First off, the trip to DC cost approximately $6,700 (as per itemized in the FY10 budget). And no, as far as I'm aware proper procedure was not followed, which is a primary purpose for us overhauling the financial code. Secondly, I will be posting the entire budget and a few other pieces of legislation the Senate has either passed, or worked on, on my website tonight. The financial bill is already there if you'd like to take a look at it. Feel free to email me or your Senator with comments or questions you might have. --- www.danielcato.org --- Eventually, the SGA website will change and all that information should be posted there...
Lastly, and most importantly, SGA has had a bumpy year so far, we all acknowledge this. I applaud the research some of you have completed regarding the alleged abuses of power. I can't truly comment on those, since the evidence isn't definitively available. However, there are many students who are working hard to make this campus better, I know it's cliche, but it's true. SGA has a lot of work cut out for it in order to rebuild the students' faith in the organization, but it doesn't detract from the initiatives started by active Senators.
Your name
Fri Nov 13 2009 15:04
You will be able to take my cigs from my cold dead tobacco stained fingers.

My common response to this kind of overreach from any govt. body borrowed from fark.com

"Now that they have solved all our other problems, Senators discuss _________"

Will Barrett
Fri Nov 13 2009 12:06
That was me below, it erased my name when I botched the spam filter.
Your name
Fri Nov 13 2009 12:06
Wow, seriously, guys? Of COURSE self-interest is a factor in running for SGA office. Virtually all of the Senators are there, at least, in part, to pad their resumes. Calling Kenneth a "fraud" for talking about the value of holding the SGA office is laughable.

Pretty weak to hide behind anonymous computer screen names, too. Most of you SGA types are narcissistic, do-nothing blowhards. There are exceptions, but while you sit there complaining about Fomunungs "agenda" and the fact that he gets room & board discounts (THE HORROR!!!), you're missing the boat on REAL LIFE issues around campus, not just those within the pathetic sphere of the SGA.

I'm not impressed with anything relating to SGA at this point. Step your game up.

You are approaching Daily Cougar status, try NOT to make the SGA a joke.

HOW MUCH OF OUR MONEY
Fri Nov 13 2009 07:18
SGA President Kenneth Fomunung during his report talked about the trip he and his cabinet took last week to Washington, D.C. to meet at the American Student Government Association conference.

HOW MUCH DID THIS TRIP COST STUDENTS???? WE WANT TO KNOW!!!!!!!!!

Your name
Fri Nov 13 2009 06:58
Miss. Leung, Director of Campus Activites, let us ask a more pertinent question about the leader of SGA whom you advise. A question that has long been ignored by SGA and student abroad. Ladies and gentlemen Kenneth Fomunung is a fraud. He has obtained the position of SGA in order to further his personal agenda. The question that I ask, and have been asking is how did Kenneth Fomunung and Vice President Prince Wilson obtain discounted housing from the Dean of Students Office in exchange for work? Kenneth Fomunung and Prince Wilson roomed together at Calhoun Lofts for a discounted price. This was obtained because of their positions with SGA. Secondly, how were they allowed to violate University policy by working more than 20 hours per week (it is against University policy to work more than 20 hours per week on campus, SGA hours as President take up 20 hours). Third, what back door deals were made by Kenneth Fomunung and Prince WIlson to obtain this discounted housing? And lastly how do Kenneth Fomunung and Prince Wilson not see that obtaining a discount from an entity under the Dean of Students (Dr. Lee), when they are supposed to lobby to the DOS office, as a direct conflict of interest. These questions need to be answered...
Marcella Leung
Thu Nov 12 2009 14:19
The issue was that Fomunung vetoed bill SGAB46005 because he said it was never presented to him. The bill called for a more fiscally responsible SGA. -- Please check this statement with President Fromunung. I believe that he may have a different perspective on why he did not sign the bill.
corruption must end
Fri Nov 13 2009 06:50
Let me cite some specific examples of how Kenneth Fomunung is a fraud. I will never stop exposing the corrupt power hungry people of our world.
Motivation for running for SGA President:
My motivation (to run for SGA president) stems from the fact that I come from a small country, Cameroon, where the opportunity for higher education has been designated by the government as a privilege rather than a necessity,” Fomunung said. (Note how he mentions nothing about helping out the student body)
“I had declared my candidacy when I found out that my brother had won his campaign, and his victory inspired me to win this election,” Fomunung said. (Note how he once again mentions nothing about helping students as a motivating factor)
“I will not deny the appeal to self-interest on campaigning. One of the reasons was obviously the implication for (my) résumé”(Note now he mentions that becoming SGA President will help him get into law school).
“(The election results) tell me that the students embraced MY vision for progressive change in SGA,” Fomunung said. “It encourages ME to believe that I really can achieve the unity that I seek.” (Notice the “me’s” and “I’s” in there. He never mentions “we” or “students.”
These quotes on motivation are telling in why it is that Kenneth Fomunung ran for office.
Platform:

“This meeting in Clear Lake is going to be pretty much electing new leaders and setting up an agenda for this coming year,” Wilson said. april 24 (At the time of this quote the President and Vice President had not release their agenda for the 46th administration)
The Lies:
“I’m reaching out to members of the 45th administration, the incumbent senators, for their experience,” SGA President Kenneth Fomunung said
Fomunung said what went on at the Oct. 28 meeting and the subsequent arguments brought the SGA together and helped address communication issues that were a growing problem. (Referring to the inter turmoil occurring because of lack of communication)
“What I have noticed ever since is that we have actually been more proactive in our approach, and people come together. I have since had meetings with Speaker Pro Tem Kilroy among others, and we have had conversations and realized the hard way that communication is essential. (Turns out he never reached out the members of SGA until much later…… actually this story was posted on November 12… hummm it took Kenneth Fomunung that long to figure out communication was the key to success.)
Plain Craziness:
“Impeach me if I really just lose sight of what I was elected to do, but at the same time, I ask that you bear with me. Things are not always going to go the way you want.”
“I am not so against it. I just don’t like the notion that by not attending Senate meetings, the president is not acting out (his) duties,” Fomunung said (regarding a bill that would require the President to not miss more than 4 months worth of meetings, I don’t think he lost sight… I think he never had sight)
Kenneth Fomunung “I didn't plan on being at the SGA Senate meeting tonight but...wow, what an experience.”
His recent illegal actions by violating the constitution, and forcing the senate to pass unnecessary legislation, his immoral actions in taking STUDENT’S MONEY so he can live on campus and his ridiculous rhetoric is disgusting. There are not enough senators out there that are willing to see corruption. It is the same individuals that will be passivists in life. Too weak or meek or shy or mature enough to stand up for what is right. Challenge authority, challenge leadership positions.. It is not a right to hold an elective office it is a privilege, do not take this privilege for granted.

COOG
Fri Nov 13 2009 05:09
Power to you guys, but a 100% smoke-free campus is never going to happen.






log out