The Daily Cougar Online
Today's Weather

Sunny weather

Hi 81 / Lo 60


University of Houston HomepageUniversity of Houston Department of Student PublicationsUH Houstonian YearbookWestern Association of University Publications ManagersThe Daily Cougar Online StaffThe Daily Cougar Copyright & Web Use NoticeThe Daily Cougar AwardsAbout The Daily Cougar OnlineThe Daily Cougar Campus Spotlight Online FormThe Daily Cougar Online ArchivesThe Daily Cougar Ad Rates & InformationWelcome to The Daily Cougar OnlineThe Daily Cougar Online Campus SpotlightThe Daily Cougar Online ComicsThe Daily Cougar Online Life & ArtsThe Daily Cougar Online SportsThe Daily Cougar Online OpinionThe Dailly Cougar Online News

Student Publications
University of Houston
151C Communications Bldg
Houston, TX 77204-4015
713.743.5350

©1991-2007
Student Publications,
All rights reserved.

Last modified:

Contact:
ktruitt@uh.edu

Volume 71, Issue 100, Wednesday, March 1, 2006

Sports

Too many moves in college sports

Super Fan

Seth Mintz

Loyalty is a simple term that's used widely in sports. Fans are loyal to teams. Players are -- for the most part -- loyal to their organizations or schools. Collegiate coaches, on the other hand, seem to be only as loyal as their interest lasts. 

Roy Williams left Kansas for UNC. Steve Alford is on the verge of walking away from Iowa for IU. The Aggies' Billy Gillespie has Missouri on his mind. Coaches demand that their players are loyal to their programs. So why can coaches toss that mantra out the window?

I understand that college sports can be very competitive. Students get four years at their school. Programs change enough as it is, because players aren't there for all that long. Can teams survive if the coaches move as constantly as their players leave? 

I am shocked that coaches don't catch more flack for their constant movement. People decry athletes' "greed" when they leave early. Are coaches not greedy when they switch schools, going after a bigger contract and more prestige?

One problem with college athletics is the system that allows coaches to act this way. Athletes and athletic directors do not hold coaches accountable for switching schools.

While this might not be the true reason many players elect to leave schools early for the pros, it doesn't help. The wrong message is sent to players. Why would any athlete want to attend, and stay at a school if the coach that recruited them is possibly on the move?

Maybe college coaches don't want to risk overstaying their welcome at schools. Possibly they want out before their administrations force them out. Though, unless your name is Mike Davis, if you win games you will almost always be welcomed back. 

Could the Larry Brown syndrome be to blame for all of this? Brown never seems satisfied where he is. Maybe it's worth it to make a crummy college team great in sports and then move on.

Not all coaches act this way, though many coaches always seem to give off the vibe that they are looking at other programs, instead of attempting to stay at schools for the long haul. 

Constant coaching changes will hurt schools and their athletes. College coaches need to demand the same amount of loyalty from themselves as they demand from their players.
 

Send comments to dcsports@mail.uh.edu

The Daily Cougar Online
 
 



Tell us how we're doing.

To contact the 
Sports Section Editor, click the e-mail link at the end of this article.

To contact other members of 
The Daily Cougar Online staff,
click here .



House Ad